The Maier Files | The loss of liberty
Machiavelli discusses the loss of liberty in the postclassical world. In one of his most famous teachings, he asserts that the modern world has become weak and enslaved primarily owing to the reliance on mercenary and auxiliary troops—on outside forces.
Machiavelli, manipulation, philosophy, liberty, tyranny, republic, restoration of the republic, loss of liberty
22092
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-22092,single-format-standard,ajax_updown_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode-theme-ver-17.1,qode-theme-bridge,disabled_footer_bottom,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.5.5,vc_responsive

The loss of liberty

Machiavelli

The loss of liberty

When one sees a great error made by an enemy, one ought to believe that there is deception underneath.” Then, we should be on the lookout for intentional “great errors” as we read Machiavelli’s works too.

Machiavelli’s works are obviously packed with quotations, including allusions and referrals to ancient historians, poets, and philosophers. But yet what about the Bible? Unexpectedly, even though there are lots of allusions to biblical tales, in the whole of the Prince and the Discourses, you can find just one, single quote from the Bible. Moreover, this quote occurs in a distinctly essential chapter, book 1, chapter 26: the single chapter in the total of the Discourses—a work dedicated to the analysis and restoration of republican government—that is explicitly focused on tyranny, to the greatest enemy of republican liberty.

 

It is honest to state, then, that at least for the mindful readers, a twofold spotlight, as it were, falls on this short quote. Machiavelli utilizes it in the course of explaining that if a man should rise from private life to be the sole ruler of a city or province, especially an unruly one, then the only sure means for holding onto it is to “make everything new.” What this simple-sounding phrase means is something extraordinarily tyrannical:

to make in cities new governments with new names, new authorities, new men; to make the rich poor, the poor rich, as did David when he became king—“who filled the hungry with good things and sent the rich away empty”; besides this to build new cities, to take down those built, to exchange the inhabitants from one place to another.

 

Machiavelli himself goes on to remark: These modes are very cruel, and enemies to every way of life, not only Christian but human; and any man whatever should flee them and wish to live in private rather than as king with so much ruin to men. Machiavelli, Discourses, 61–62 (1.26)

 

Machiavelli makes a peculiar blunder here. The quote he recites is not relating to David whatsoever. It is describing—God! An calculated “great error”? Perhaps it would appear to be covertly communicating a significant and dangerous message: that the Biblical God is a great tyrant or, more in general, that the Christian religion is probably the real cause of the loss of the ancient republican liberty that he, Machiavelli, is trying in this book to rebuild or to revive. In the ‘Prince’, as well, Machiavelli addresses the loss of liberty in the postclassical world. In one of his best known teachings, he emphasizes that the modern world has become weak and enslaved essentially due to the dependence on mercenary and auxiliary troops—on outside forces. This military problem—and not Christianity—would appear to be the main reason for losing freedom. To remain strong and free, one must always rely on “one’s own arms.” To prove and illustrate this core principle of self-reliance, Machiavelli gives a number of examples, culminating in the famous biblical story of David and Goliath.

Saul, to give David spirit, armed him with his own arms—which David, as soon as he had them on, refused, saying that with them he could not give a good account of himself, and so he would rather meet the enemy with his sling and his knife.

 

As most everyone knows, David did not take a knife or sword with him, but only his sling. The whole point of the story—indeed, the whole point of the story—is that we should not rely on ourselves or our own arms: we must put our whole faith and trust in the Lord, who alone can deliver us from our enemies as from all evil.

 

He presented the David and Goliath tale to be able to claim, on the outside, that his new teaching is conforming to the Bible. But he changes— he reverses—the crucial fine detail of the knife to be able covertly to declare the quite contrary statement: that his central new teaching of military self-reliance—and in the end of human self-reliance—is diametrically in opposition to the central teaching of the Bible. For the Christian teaching of passivity and trust in the Lord, in his view, has disarmed the world, making it weak and ripe for tyranny. Machiavelli would contribute to the restoration of ancient republican liberty by putting a sword back in human hands. … Nothing is ever what it seems.

 

  • Nineteenth century British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli commented that the world is governed by very different people from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes. Dr. Carroll Quigley who taught at Harvard and Princeton and at the Foreign Service School of Georgetown University w...

  • Throughout recorded history humanity has been periodically uplifted by the contributions of a few gifted and enlightened individuals, whose teachings and philosophy have gradually raised the level of human awareness. Lesser mortals have also played a vital role in this process and the seeding of hum...

  • Dr. Joseph Hieronim Retinger is perhaps one of the most mysterious figures of the twentieth century. It is he who is credited with being the father of Bilderberg. He is also credited with being the motivating force behind the European League for Economic Cooperation, the European Movement, and the C...

  • Otto Maier and the attempts of Gross Industries to develop “free energy” stood not alone in the 1920s and 1930s. Take for example the “free energy” invention of T. Henry Moray, which is probably the most famous and well witnessed in the history of the field. The best version ...

  • Mr. Lipinski wrote a controversial book, “The Horus Lodge,” (Die Horus Loge) or rather the statements of his grandfather are very controversial in this book. These statements contain an eerie echo to Rolf Naumann’s narrative that formed the basis for the Maier files series. Mr. Lip...

  • “When one sees a great error made by an enemy, one ought to believe that there is deception underneath.” Then, we should be on the lookout for intentional “great errors” as we read Machiavelli’s works too....

  • The British enjoy deceiving their enemies. When the Prussian strategist Carl von Clausewitz defined war in 1833 as ‘those acts of force to compel our enemy to do our will’, he missed out the dimension that the British political philosopher Thomas Hobbes had spotted nearly two centuries earlier: ‘For...

  • The destruction of the worldwide economic order in the wake of World War II encouraged world leaders in 1944 to form a meeting to generate alternatives. This conference, referred to as Bretton Woods, resulted in the development of a new global fixed exchange rate regime with the U.S. dollar playing a...

  • The Occult Adepts of British Intelligence, Cecil Williamson continuation of previous post   –>  Did Crowley get involved in the interrogation of Rudolf Hess?   Another occultist who was supposed to have been involved in or connected to the Hess affair was Cecil Hugh Williamson, the founder o...

  • Did you ever have an experience that turned your whole world upside down? Maybe you saw a ghost or a UFO. Perhaps you had an unusual, vivid dream that seemed real. Maybe you suddenly knew that a certain event was going to happen in the future. Or, perhaps you saw a creature or a being that did not fi...